Files
sigma-rules/rules/cross-platform/discovery_security_software_grep.toml
T
Jonhnathan f5c992b6de [Security Content] Add Investigation Guides - 2 - 8.5 (#2314)
* [Security Content] Add Investigation Guides - 2 - 8.5

* Update rules/windows/lateral_movement_execution_via_file_shares_sequence.toml

* Merge branch 'main' into investigation_guides_8.5_2

* Revert "Merge branch 'main' into investigation_guides_8.5_2"

This reverts commit fb3c3f0245301d49229534d8776478c32f6c190e.

* Apply suggested changes from review

* Update discovery_security_software_grep.toml

* Apply suggestions from review

* Apply suggestions from review
2022-09-26 12:59:39 -03:00

131 lines
4.9 KiB
TOML

[metadata]
creation_date = "2020/12/20"
maturity = "production"
min_stack_comments = "New fields added: required_fields, related_integrations, setup"
min_stack_version = "8.3.0"
updated_date = "2022/09/20"
[rule]
author = ["Elastic"]
description = """
Identifies the use of the grep command to discover known third-party macOS and Linux security tools, such as Antivirus
or Host Firewall details.
"""
false_positives = ["Endpoint Security installers, updaters and post installation verification scripts."]
from = "now-9m"
index = ["logs-endpoint.events.*", "auditbeat-*"]
language = "eql"
license = "Elastic License v2"
name = "Security Software Discovery via Grep"
note = """## Triage and analysis
### Investigating Security Software Discovery via Grep
After successfully compromising an environment, attackers may try to gain situational awareness to plan their next steps.
This can happen by running commands to enumerate network resources, users, connections, files, and installed security
software.
This rule looks for the execution of the `grep` utility with arguments compatible to the enumeration of the security
software installed on the host. Attackers can use this information to decide whether or not to infect a system, disable
protections, use bypasses, etc.
#### Possible investigation steps
- Investigate the process execution chain (parent process tree) for unknown processes. Examine their executable files
for prevalence and whether they are located in expected locations.
- Investigate other alerts associated with the user/host during the past 48 hours.
- Investigate any abnormal account behavior, such as command executions, file creations or modifications, and network
connections.
- Investigate any abnormal behavior by the subject process such as network connections, file modifications, and any
spawned child processes.
- Inspect the host for suspicious or abnormal behavior in the alert timeframe.
- Validate the activity is not related to planned patches, updates, network administrator activity, or legitimate
software installations.
### False positive analysis
- Discovery activities are not inherently malicious if they occur in isolation. As long as the analyst did not identify
suspicious activity related to the user or host, such alerts can be dismissed.
### Response and remediation
- Initiate the incident response process based on the outcome of the triage.
- Isolate the involved hosts to prevent further post-compromise behavior.
- Investigate credential exposure on systems compromised or used by the attacker to ensure all compromised accounts are
identified. Reset passwords for these accounts and other potentially compromised credentials, such as email, business
systems, and web services.
- Run a full antimalware scan. This may reveal additional artifacts left in the system, persistence mechanisms, and
malware components.
- Determine the initial vector abused by the attacker and take action to prevent reinfection via the same vector.
- Using the incident response data, update logging and audit policies to improve the mean time to detect (MTTD) and the
mean time to respond (MTTR).
## Setup
If enabling an EQL rule on a non-elastic-agent index (such as beats) for versions <8.2, events will not define `event.ingested` and default fallback for EQL rules was not added until 8.2, so you will need to add a custom pipeline to populate `event.ingested` to @timestamp for this rule to work.
"""
risk_score = 47
rule_id = "870aecc0-cea4-4110-af3f-e02e9b373655"
severity = "medium"
tags = ["Elastic", "Host", "macOS", "Linux", "Threat Detection", "Discovery"]
timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
type = "eql"
query = '''
process where event.type == "start" and
process.name : "grep" and user.id != "0" and
not process.parent.executable : "/Library/Application Support/*" and
process.args :
("Little Snitch*",
"Avast*",
"Avira*",
"ESET*",
"BlockBlock*",
"360Sec*",
"LuLu*",
"KnockKnock*",
"kav",
"KIS",
"RTProtectionDaemon*",
"Malware*",
"VShieldScanner*",
"WebProtection*",
"webinspectord*",
"McAfee*",
"isecespd*",
"macmnsvc*",
"masvc*",
"kesl*",
"avscan*",
"guard*",
"rtvscand*",
"symcfgd*",
"scmdaemon*",
"symantec*",
"sophos*",
"osquery*",
"elastic-endpoint*"
) and
not (process.args : "Avast" and process.args : "Passwords")
'''
[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1518"
name = "Software Discovery"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1518/"
[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
id = "T1518.001"
name = "Security Software Discovery"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1518/001/"
[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0007"
name = "Discovery"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0007/"