diff --git a/rules/integrations/kubernetes/credential_access_kubernetes_secret_read_by_node_or_pod_service_account.toml b/rules/integrations/kubernetes/credential_access_kubernetes_secret_read_by_node_or_pod_service_account.toml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bb4434b66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rules/integrations/kubernetes/credential_access_kubernetes_secret_read_by_node_or_pod_service_account.toml
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+[metadata]
+creation_date = "2026/04/22"
+integration = ["kubernetes"]
+maturity = "production"
+updated_date = "2026/04/22"
+
+[rule]
+author = ["Elastic"]
+description = """
+Kubernetes audit identities for kubelet (`system:node:*`) and workloads (`system:serviceaccount:*`) are meant to
+operate with tight, predictable API usage. Direct `get` or `list` on the Secrets API from those principals is
+often a sign of credential access. Attackers who stole a pod service-account token or node credentials sweep Secret objects for
+tokens, registry credentials, TLS keys, or application configuration. Even denied attempts still reveal intent to
+reach sensitive material. Legitimate controllers do read secrets they mount or manage, so this signal is most valuable
+when paired with triage (namespace scope, user agent, RBAC, and whether the identity should touch those secret names at
+all).
+"""
+false_positives = [
+    """
+    In-cluster operators, CSI drivers, GitOps agents, and some platform controllers legitimately list or get Secrets in
+    namespaces they manage; exclude known service accounts, namespaces, or user agents after baselining.
+    """,
+    """
+    Rare kubelet or node maintenance tooling may touch Secret APIs; validate against change windows and approved node
+    management paths.
+    """,
+]
+index = ["logs-kubernetes.audit_logs-*"]
+language = "kuery"
+license = "Elastic License v2"
+name = "Kubernetes Secret get or list from Node or Pod Service Account"
+note = """## Triage and analysis
+
+### Investigating Kubernetes Secret get or list from Node or Pod Service Account
+
+This rule fires on Kubernetes audit events where the authenticated user is a node (`system:node:<nodename>`) or a
+pod service account (`system:serviceaccount:<namespace>:<name>`) and the verb maps to read-style access
+(`get`, `list`) on the **secrets** resource. Treat node-originated secret reads as high priority: kubelet should
+not broadly enumerate cluster secrets. For service accounts, prioritize cross-namespace access, access to
+high-value secret names, and clients that do not match the workload’s normal user agent or deployment.
+
+### Possible investigation steps
+
+- Resolve `user.name` (or `kubernetes.audit.user.username` if present) to the node or workload and review RBAC
+  RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBindings for secret `get`/`list` scope.
+- Inspect `kubernetes.audit.objectRef.namespace`, `kubernetes.audit.objectRef.name`, source IP, and
+  `user_agent.original` for automation you recognize versus anomalous scripts or generic HTTP clients.
+- Review `kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision` for successful reads versus probing denials.
+- Correlate with pod exec, token creation, RoleBinding changes, or secret modification in the same time window.
+
+### False positive analysis
+
+- Controllers that reconcile Secrets (e.g. cert-manager, external-secrets, sealed-secrets) may match; allowlist their
+  service accounts if behavior is expected and scoped.
+- Helm and package managers can list release secrets during deploys; correlate with pipelines and chart releases.
+
+### Response and remediation
+
+- If malicious, revoke the token or node credentials, cordon or isolate the host or workload, rotate exposed secrets, and
+  tighten RBAC to least privilege for the affected identity.
+"""
+references = [
+    "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552/007/",
+    "https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authentication/#service-account-tokens",
+]
+risk_score = 47
+rule_id = "f8a31c62-0d4e-4b9a-b7e1-6c2a9d4e8f10"
+severity = "medium"
+tags = [
+    "Data Source: Kubernetes",
+    "Domain: Kubernetes",
+    "Use Case: Threat Detection",
+    "Tactic: Credential Access",
+    "Resources: Investigation Guide",
+]
+timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
+type = "query"
+query = '''
+data_stream.dataset:"kubernetes.audit_logs" and
+event.action:(get or list) and
+kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource:"secrets" and
+user.name:(system\:serviceaccount\:* or system\:node\:*) and source.ip:*
+'''
+
+[[rule.threat]]
+framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
+
+[[rule.threat.technique]]
+id = "T1552"
+name = "Unsecured Credentials"
+reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552/"
+
+[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
+id = "T1552.007"
+name = "Container API"
+reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552/007/"
+
+[rule.threat.tactic]
+id = "TA0006"
+name = "Credential Access"
+reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0006/"