adpare
111 lines
8.3 KiB
JSON
111 lines
8.3 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"type": "bundle",
|
|
"id": "bundle--0b33e01f-2506-478f-9345-a0c4aeaf5b9e",
|
|
"spec_version": "2.0",
|
|
"objects": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "attack-pattern",
|
|
"id": "attack-pattern--7e3beebd-8bfe-4e7b-a892-e44ab06a75f9",
|
|
"created": "2020-10-01T00:36:30.759Z",
|
|
"created_by_ref": "identity--c78cb6e5-0c4b-4611-8297-d1b8b55e40b5",
|
|
"revoked": false,
|
|
"external_references": [
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "mitre-attack",
|
|
"url": "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584",
|
|
"external_id": "T1584"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "amnesty_nso_pegasus",
|
|
"description": "Amnesty International Security Lab. (2021, July 18). Forensic Methodology Report: How to catch NSO Group\u2019s Pegasus. Retrieved February 22, 2022.",
|
|
"url": "https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2021/07/forensic-methodology-report-how-to-catch-nso-groups-pegasus/"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "Sysdig Proxyjacking",
|
|
"description": "Crystal Morin. (2023, April 4). Proxyjacking has Entered the Chat. Retrieved July 6, 2023.",
|
|
"url": "https://sysdig.com/blog/proxyjacking-attackers-log4j-exploited/"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "FireEye DNS Hijack 2019",
|
|
"description": "Hirani, M., Jones, S., Read, B. (2019, January 10). Global DNS Hijacking Campaign: DNS Record Manipulation at Scale. Retrieved October 9, 2020.",
|
|
"url": "https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2019/01/global-dns-hijacking-campaign-dns-record-manipulation-at-scale.html"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "ICANNDomainNameHijacking",
|
|
"description": "ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee. (2005, July 12). Domain Name Hijacking: Incidents, Threats, Risks and Remediation. Retrieved November 17, 2024.",
|
|
"url": "https://www.icann.org/en/ssac/registration-services/documents/sac-007-domain-name-hijacking-incidents-threats-risks-and-remediation-12-07-2005-en"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "Koczwara Beacon Hunting Sep 2021",
|
|
"description": "Koczwara, M. (2021, September 7). Hunting Cobalt Strike C2 with Shodan. Retrieved October 12, 2021.",
|
|
"url": "https://michaelkoczwara.medium.com/cobalt-strike-c2-hunting-with-shodan-c448d501a6e2"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "Nearest Neighbor Volexity",
|
|
"description": "Koessel, Sean. Adair, Steven. Lancaster, Tom. (2024, November 22). The Nearest Neighbor Attack: How A Russian APT Weaponized Nearby Wi-Fi Networks for Covert Access. Retrieved February 25, 2025.",
|
|
"url": "https://www.volexity.com/blog/2024/11/22/the-nearest-neighbor-attack-how-a-russian-apt-weaponized-nearby-wi-fi-networks-for-covert-access/"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "Mandiant APT1",
|
|
"description": "Mandiant. (n.d.). APT1 Exposing One of China\u2019s Cyber Espionage Units. Retrieved July 18, 2016.",
|
|
"url": "https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/services/pdfs/mandiant-apt1-report.pdf"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "Talos DNSpionage Nov 2018",
|
|
"description": "Mercer, W., Rascagneres, P. (2018, November 27). DNSpionage Campaign Targets Middle East. Retrieved October 9, 2020.",
|
|
"url": "https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2018/11/dnspionage-campaign-targets-middle-east.html"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "NSA NCSC Turla OilRig",
|
|
"description": "NSA/NCSC. (2019, October 21). Cybersecurity Advisory: Turla Group Exploits Iranian APT To Expand Coverage Of Victims. Retrieved October 16, 2020.",
|
|
"url": "https://media.defense.gov/2019/Oct/18/2002197242/-1/-1/0/NSA_CSA_Turla_20191021%20ver%204%20-%20nsa.gov.pdf"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "Mandiant SCANdalous Jul 2020",
|
|
"description": "Stephens, A. (2020, July 13). SCANdalous! (External Detection Using Network Scan Data and Automation). Retrieved November 17, 2024.",
|
|
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/scandalous-external-detection-using-network-scan-data-and-automation/"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "ThreatConnect Infrastructure Dec 2020",
|
|
"description": "ThreatConnect. (2020, December 15). Infrastructure Research and Hunting: Boiling the Domain Ocean. Retrieved October 12, 2021.",
|
|
"url": "https://threatconnect.com/blog/infrastructure-research-hunting/"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source_name": "FireEye EPS Awakens Part 2",
|
|
"description": "Winters, R. (2015, December 20). The EPS Awakens - Part 2. Retrieved January 22, 2016.",
|
|
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20151226205946/https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2015/12/the-eps-awakens-part-two.html"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"object_marking_refs": [
|
|
"marking-definition--fa42a846-8d90-4e51-bc29-71d5b4802168"
|
|
],
|
|
"modified": "2025-10-24T17:49:01.181Z",
|
|
"name": "Compromise Infrastructure",
|
|
"description": "Adversaries may compromise third-party infrastructure that can be used during targeting. Infrastructure solutions include physical or cloud servers, domains, network devices, and third-party web and DNS services. Instead of buying, leasing, or renting infrastructure an adversary may compromise infrastructure and use it during other phases of the adversary lifecycle.(Citation: Mandiant APT1)(Citation: ICANNDomainNameHijacking)(Citation: Talos DNSpionage Nov 2018)(Citation: FireEye EPS Awakens Part 2) Additionally, adversaries may compromise numerous machines to form a botnet they can leverage.\n\nUse of compromised infrastructure allows adversaries to stage, launch, and execute operations. Compromised infrastructure can help adversary operations blend in with traffic that is seen as normal, such as contact with high reputation or trusted sites. For example, adversaries may leverage compromised infrastructure (potentially also in conjunction with [Digital Certificates](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588/004)) to further blend in and support staged information gathering and/or [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) campaigns.(Citation: FireEye DNS Hijack 2019) Adversaries may also compromise numerous machines to support [Proxy](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1090) and/or proxyware services or to form a botnet.(Citation: amnesty_nso_pegasus)(Citation: Sysdig Proxyjacking) Additionally, adversaries may compromise infrastructure residing in close proximity to a target in order to gain [Initial Access](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0001) via [Wi-Fi Networks](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1669).(Citation: Nearest Neighbor Volexity)\n\nBy using compromised infrastructure, adversaries may enable follow-on malicious operations. Prior to targeting, adversaries may also compromise the infrastructure of other adversaries.(Citation: NSA NCSC Turla OilRig)",
|
|
"kill_chain_phases": [
|
|
{
|
|
"kill_chain_name": "mitre-attack",
|
|
"phase_name": "resource-development"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"x_mitre_attack_spec_version": "3.2.0",
|
|
"x_mitre_contributors": [
|
|
"Jeremy Galloway",
|
|
"Shailesh Tiwary (Indian Army)",
|
|
"Menachem Goldstein",
|
|
"Cian Heasley",
|
|
"Rouven Bissinger (SySS GmbH)"
|
|
],
|
|
"x_mitre_deprecated": false,
|
|
"x_mitre_domains": [
|
|
"enterprise-attack"
|
|
],
|
|
"x_mitre_is_subtechnique": false,
|
|
"x_mitre_modified_by_ref": "identity--c78cb6e5-0c4b-4611-8297-d1b8b55e40b5",
|
|
"x_mitre_platforms": [
|
|
"PRE"
|
|
],
|
|
"x_mitre_version": "1.6"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |